← doc
dow-uap-d48-report-september-1996
p014 / 146
It is obvious from the response-mode definitions in Appendix A that none of the described
vehicle failures can be considered as a Mode 1, 2, or 3 response, or a Mode-4 on-trajectory
failure.• Except possibly for (2), it also seems apparent that none can be modeled as either a
rapid tumble or a slow tum.




• Although prompt destruct action during any of the described flights might have resulted in a Mode-4
  classification, the safety officer typically needs several seconds to evaluate data after a malfunction.
  Quick action is contrary to safety philosophy if impact limit lines are not threatened and the destruct •
  system is not at risk, since additional flight time enhances the user's opportunity to pinpoint the
  nature of the problem.


9/10/96                                            5                                                 RTI


Detected images on this page (1)

15,45 · 70×20%
diagramf(R,φ) = (C·x^(n)·D) / (2(T1-T2)·[(e^((s-1))·(T1/T2)·RR] (1)

Vision Description (EN)

A technical document page titled '3. Understanding the Mode-5 Failure Response'. It features several paragraphs of text explaining the Mode-5 impact-density function, including a centered mathematical formula labeled as Equation (1). The page is clean with no redactions or classification markings visible.

Descrição Vision (PT-BR)

Uma página de documento técnico intitulada '3. Understanding the Mode-5 Failure Response'. Apresenta vários parágrafos de texto explicando a função de densidade de impacto Mode-5, incluindo uma fórmula matemática centralizada rotulada como Equação (1). A página está limpa, sem rasuras ou marcações de classificação visíveis.